If Anne Redferne had felt any relief at the not guilty
verdict delivered on the Tuesday evening, this was crushed the following
morning, when she was tried for the murder of Christopher Nutter. The
confessions of Demdike and James Device were read again, as was the evidence
given by Margaret Crooke at Fence. If that evidence had been insufficient to
convict her of the murder of Robert Nutter, it should not have been enough to
convict her of the death of his father, but it wasn’t. She was found guilty.
Lancashire 1623 |
The trial of Alice Nutter was
strange. Unlike the others tried, she was a gentlewoman, a person of substance
and education. In his Wonderfull Discoverie, Thomas Potts writes
“The two degrees of persons which chiefly practise Witch-craft, are such, as are in great miserie and pouertie, for such the Deuill allures to follow him, by promising great riches, and worldly commoditie; Others, though rich, yet burne in a desperate desire of Reuenge; Hee allures them by promises, to get their turne satisfied to their hearts contentment.”
This is lifted directly from
King James’s Daemonologie, almost word for word, and he goes on to say,
“whether by the meanes of the rest of the Witches, or some vnfortunate occasion, shee was drawne to fall to this wicked course of life, I know not.”
The seventy year old widow was convicted on evidence regarding the events at
Malkin Tower, but one explanation is that Alice Nutter was on her way to, or
coming back from, Mass on Good Friday, and refused to defend herself as she may
thereby have incriminated some of her fellow Catholics. A John Nutter, from
Reedley Hollow in Pendle, was executed at Tyburn for being a Catholic priest in
1583, his brother John Nutter was executed for the same at Lancaster in 1600; a
nephew, Ellis Nutter was ordained in 1601. Was Alice Nutter, a Catholic, a
victim of the strictly Protestant Roger Nowell? Local legends still say this
was the cause (we have long memories in these parts).
Witchery |
Katherine Hewitt’s and
Alice Gray’s cases were the next. Katherine Hewitt (aka Mouldheels), was
charged with the murder of Anne Foulds, a child, and for having ‘in hanck’ a
child of Michael Hartley, that is, to be in the process of murdering the child
by witchcraft. Potts does not include the testimony of Alice Gray, and although
he lists her as being present at the Malkin Tower, he includes her name amongst
those in his list of the Salmesbury witches. In any case, Alice Gray was the
only one of the Pendle witches found not guilty. At mid-day on August 18th
Anne Redferne, Alice Nutter and Katherine Hewitt were declared to be guilty.
In
the afternoon, Jane Bulcock and her son, John, were brought in. They pleaded
not guilty, and denied being at the Malkin Tower. Nine year old Jennet Device
was re-called; she picked Jane out in an identity parade and identified John as
the man who turned the spit as the stolen sheep was roasted.
Lastly, Alizon
Device was tried. John Law, the pedlar, and his son, Abraham, gave evidence,
and again Alizon broke down and begged forgiveness, which, again, was granted.
Alizon spoke of her familiar, a black dog, as did John Law, although it had not
been mentioned in the original complaint earlier in April. She said how she had
wanted to buy pins from Law, Law said she had begged for pins, Abraham Law said
she wanted to buy pins but had no money, so his father had given some to her.
Still, on the strength of her confession, Alizon Device was found to be guilty,
the same verdict being passed on the Bulcocks, (in a printing error in the Wonderfull
Discoverie, to which the printer admitted, their verdict was shown as ‘Not
Guilty’. This was corrected later).
Judge Bromley passed sentence on Anne
Whittle, Anne Redferne, Elizabeth Device, James Device, Alizon Device, Jane
Bulcock, John Bulcock and Katherine Hewitt –
“You shall all goe from hence to the Castle, from whence you came; from thence you shall bee carried to the place of Execution for this Countie: where your bodies shall bee hanged vntill you be dead; AND GOD HAVE MERCIE VPON YOVR SOVLES.”
No comments:
Post a Comment