If you follow the River Ribble as
it loops down its Valley, past Pendle, Clitheroe, Whalley and Blackburn, it
comes to Samlesbury, before running down to the sea at Preston. There stands
the splendid black-and-white timbered Samlesbury Hall, once home to the
Southworth family. The Southworths were one of the old Lancashire Catholic
families, and Samlesbury Hall was central to those locals of the old faith.
Samlesbury Hall |
Sir
John Southworth had been Sheriff of Lancashire three times, in the 1560s, but
had spent much of his later life imprisoned for his beliefs. The Recusancy
Acts, from 1593 on, had fixed the civil, and sometimes criminal, penalties for
refusing to acknowledge the Anglican Church, and recusants were required to pay
fines, for example, for not attending Anglican services. In early 1612, a
decree had been announced that Justices of the Peace should make lists of known
recusants in their areas. Protestants like Roger Nowell and Nicholas Bannister
complied, as opponents of Catholicism, but Bannister’s son-in-law, Robert
Holden of Holden Hall, Haslingden, was both Magistrate and Catholic.
Lancashire |
When he
arraigned the ‘Samlesbury witches’ his motives were a strange mirror of his
fellow Magistrates. Jane Southworth was the daughter of Sir Richard Sherburne
of Stonyhurst, another old Lancashire Catholic family. She married John
Southworth, son of Thomas Southworth. Thomas was the son of old Sir John, and
had converted to the Church of England, thereby incurring the wrath of his
father. Old Sir John was said ‘not to have liked’ his grandson’s bride, not
least because, like his son (her father-in-law), she had forsaken her Catholic
faith. News reached Magistrate Holden that Jane, together with two more women
of Samlesbury who had converted from Catholicism, was involved in witchcraft.
The accusations were made by a fourteen-year-old, Grace Sowerbutts, who claimed
that Jennet Bierley, her grandmother, had ‘in the likenesse of a black Dogge,
with two legges’ had tried to persuade her to drown herself in the Ribble. At
another time, her grandmother and Ellen Bierley, her aunt, had taken a baby
from its sleeping parents, driven a nail through its navel and sucked from the
hole. The baby died, and Jennet and Ellen Bierley had gone to St Leonard’s
Churchyard, disinterred the corpse, cooked and ate it, and seethed the bones in
a pot and
“… with the Fat that came out of the faid bones, they faid they would annoint themfelues, that thereby they might fometimes change themfelues into other fhapes.”
Eating dead babies |
These women, with Jane Southworth, had met with ‘black things’
that had carried them, and young Grace, over the Ribble to the Red Bank, where
they had danced and eaten, and these black things had then laid the four of
them down and ‘did abufe their bodies.’ Jane Southworth, she said, had many times
taken her from her bed to a hay-loft, where she was beaten, left unconscious
and bewitched.
Dancing with Black Things |
In the courtroom at Lancaster
Castle, fourteen-year-old Grace Sowerbutts, like nine-year-old Jennet Device
before her, began to give her evidence. Unlike Jennet, however, she raised
suspicions and pretty soon the case collapsed as she admitted that she had been
‘schooled’ by a Catholic priest, Master Thompson. This ‘Thompson’ turns out to
have been the brother of Jane Southworth’s father-in-law, Thomas, and was really
Father Christopher Southworth. Young Grace, a Catholic, had been sent to this
priest to learn her prayers, but he had coached her in her lies, with a view to
discrediting and punishing the Protestant coverts in the Samlesbury area. In
all, seven persons from Samlesbury were called to Lancaster, although Potts
only gives us the evidence against the three women mentioned. As you may
expect, all seven were returned to Samlesbury, declared innocent.
Who'd be a Papist in 17th Century Lancashire? |
Judges
Bromley and Altham condemned these nefarious Papist tricks, conveniently
forgetting the example set by John Darrel, George More and other such
Protestant clerics when the shoe was on the other foot. Jennet Device, “being
a yong Maide” of nine years old, is praised for “…what modeftie,
gouernement, and vnderftanding, fhee deliuered this Euidence”. Grace
Sowerbutts, in contrast is “this impudent wench,” her testimony a “…
Legend of Lyes.” Astonishingly, the judges even point out how
“…the wrinkles of an old wiues face is good euidence to the Iurie againft a Witch. And how often will the common people fay (Her eyes are funke in her head, God bleffe vs from her).”
They mock the idea that Jennet Bierley “ …
transformed her felfe into a Dogge. I would know by what meanes any Prieft can
maintaine this point of Euidence”, but had permitted the evidence of “ …
a toade, or something like a toade,” against Margaret Pearson. Horses, as
they say, for courses.
Dedication from Potts - Wonderfull Discoverie |
Thomas Potts dedicated his book, The Wonderfull
Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster, to Sir Thomas Kynvet
(the capturer of Guy Fawkes) and Lady Elizabeth, his wife, and is careful to
include in it the ‘evidence’ of the Malkin Tower plan to blow up the Castle at
Lancaster, as a reminder to the King of the Gunpowder Plot of seven years
before. Maybe the gesture was appreciated, as Thomas Potts was, in 1615,
rewarded with "…the keepership of Skalme Park - for the breeding and
training of the King’s hounds.”
Nice work if you can get it.
No comments:
Post a Comment