The man who arrested Guy Fawkes
in the cellars beneath Parliament on November 5th 1605, was Sir
Thomas Kynvet. Kynvet was the first domestic resident of Number 10 Downing
Street, which later became the home of the British Prime Minister. (10 Downing
Street is actually three houses; a mansion known as ‘the house at the back’, a
townhouse behind it, and a smaller cottage. The three were combined to produce
the current building. The last resident of the cottage, incidentally, was
called Mr Chicken). As a boy, one member of the Kynvet household was one Thomas
Potts. In time, Potts became Associate Clerk on the Northern Circuit, and in
August 1612, he was at Lancaster, where the circuit judges, Sir James Altham
and Sir Edward Bromley, ordered him to write an account of the proceedings. In
November, Potts had finished his account and handed it to Bromley for his
corrections and revisions, and, in 1613, it was published under the title The
Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster.
Thomas Potts - The Wonderfull Discoverie - Title Page - 1613 |
It is a
prolix and repetitive account, but makes fascinating reading nonetheless. What
it is not is a verbatim record of the trials; it is a reconstruction,
produced later from documents and memories, and omits much of the legal
procedures of a Seventeenth Century courtroom. It gives the impression that the
witnesses were examined individually, when they would have been tried in
groups, and written depositions are presented as if they had been spoken, but
it is, in spirit, a trustworthy record.
Lancaster Castle |
I don’t know if they still do it,
but when I visited Lancaster Castle as a boy, the tour guides would take you
into the dungeons, close the door and turn out the lights. It was terrifying.
It was bone-numbingly cold, pitch dark, massively oppressive and utterly
claustrophobic. After only a few seconds, the relief when the lights were
turned back on was palpable. It is unsurprising then, that Elizabeth Southerns,
eighty years plus, blind and crippled, died in custody before coming to trial.
But ask anyone from East Lancashire to name a Pendle witch, the reply almost
certainly will be ‘Owd Mother Demdike’, such is her hold on folk memory, even
four hundred years on.
Witchery |
The Pendle witches were not the
only Lancashire witches tried on Tuesday August 18th and Wednesday
August 19th 1612; there were also the trials of Margaret Pearson
‘The Witch of Padiham’, Isobel Roby of Windle, and seven so-called Salmesbury
Witches.
Owd Mother Chattox, Anne Whittle,
was the first to be heard. Potts describes her as “a very old withered spent
and decreped creature, her sight almost gone … her lippes euer chattering and
walking [i.e. speaking], but no man knew what”. Her nickname may come from this
constant chattering, as in chatt[erb]ox, or it may be a corruption of Chadwick,
perhaps her maiden name, and a common enough name in the area. She was already
damned by her own confession to Nowell, but pleaded not guilty, admitted
tearfully that the evidence was the truth, asked God for mercy for herself and
her daughter Anne, yet to be tried, and ended by saying ‘Fancie’ had stolen
away most of her sight, and had last appeared to her as a bear, which had
knocked her down when she refused to speak to him.
The next to be heard was
Demdike’s daughter, Elizabeth Device (possibly a variant of Davies), also known
as Skenning Lizzie or Skenning Bessie. To ‘sken’ is a northern, particularly
Lancastrian, verb, meaning ‘to look at’, and also ‘to squint’. Elizabeth was
stunningly ugly, who had
“… a preposterous marke of Nature … her left eye standing lower than the other, the one looking downe, the other vp … so strangely deformed as the best that were present in that great Audience did affirme they had not often seene the like,” (Potts).
Like Chattox, her previous
confession had already sealed her fate. When she saw her nine-year-old
daughter, Jennet, was in the court she began to rant and rave, and eventually
had to be taken out of the room. Jennet, the only member of the family still
free, was placed on a table and allowed to condemn her own mother of
‘Witchcrafts, Inchantments, Charmes and Sorceries,’ of consorting with
familiars, and hosting the sabbat at Malkin Tower. It seems likely that the
child had been carefully schooled prior to this, probably by Roger Nowell. Her
mother was brought back in and begged the court’s mercy. Her son James Device
was next to be brought before the bench. ‘Soft Jamie’ had suffered greatly in
the dungeon, Potts says he was “…so insensible, weake, and vnable in all
thinges, as he could neither speake, heare, or stand, but was holden vp,” and
hints he may have attempted suicide to avoid the trial. James was weak-minded,
and would probably agreed to anything put to him by a person in authority, and,
as before, he had already condemned himself. In the evening of Tuesday August
18th Anne Redferne was tried, and for want of evidence, found not
guilty of the murder of her would-be seducer Robert Nutter. Apart from her plea
of ‘Not Guilty’ there is no word of her own recorded. The jury then returned
guilty verdicts on Anne Whittle, Elizabeth Device and James Device.
No comments:
Post a Comment