Thursday, 17 January 2013

The Terrible Torture of the Pressing Penance

           Sir Thomas Smith was a classicist, diplomat and Secretary of State in the court of Elizabeth I, and he wrote a book De Republica Anglorum that was published, posthumously, in 1583. In it, Smith wrote, 
“…torment or question which is used by the order of the civill lawe and custome of other countreis to put a malefactor to excessive paine, to make him confesse of him selfe, or of his felowes or complices, is not used in England.
Now this is a odd thing for Smith to write, because in a letter written in Lord Burghley’s hand and with Elizabeth’s signet applied, dated September 25th 1571, Smith is specifically authorised to put two servants of the Duke of Norfolk named Barker and Banister, who were prisoners in the Tower of London, to the rack. Two days later, Smith replied to Burghley, advising that the racking had yielded some results and might yet yield more. 

Guy Fawkes racked

It is common knowledge that Guy Fawkes was racked in November 1605, to disclose details of the Gunpowder Plot, and the records of the Tower show that the items of torture were not short of victims during the reigns of Elizabeth and James I. Thus, the good knight Smith was being somewhat economical with the truth. Torture was being used in English prisons and had been for a good many years. One form was initially called prison forte et dure and a statute of 1275 allows for men who will not answer charges put to them shall ‘… have strong and hard Imprisonment (prison forte et dure)’ applied. A person could not be tried for felony until they had pleaded either ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’, but if a guilty person refused to plead, to ‘stand mute for malice’; their property could not be confiscated by the crown and could be willed or inherited by their relatives. 

Peine forte et dure - Newgate

The ‘hard Imprisonment’ meant being placed in the worst part in the prison, on bare hard ground, clad only in a linen loin cloth, fed one day on the worst bread and on alternating days given putrid water (but never fed and watered on the same day), and laden with iron chains from hand to elbow and from knee to foot. In 1302, one prisoner subjected to this ‘great penance’ gave up his information after ten days, but in 1357, Cecilia de Rygeway, indicted for murdering her husband, ‘stood mute’ and suffered the penance for forty days without relenting and in consequence was pardoned. This practice was felt to be too harsh and it was too difficult to assuage the pain upon confession and so it was replaced by a variation, peine forte et dure, (‘hard and forceful punishment’) where, in addition to the starving, the prisoners were also pressed with weights, ‘more than they can bear.’ Shakespeare alludes to this in Troilus and Cressida, when Pandarus says, 
Because it shall not speak of your pretty encounters, press it to death.” 

Margaret Clitherow pressed to death

An instance was recorded from 1406, and further refinements were added over the years, as in the case of Margaret Clitherow of York, a Catholic accused of harbouring priests in 1586. Margaret ‘stood mute’ because she feared that any information she might reveal would incriminate her children and so was condemned to peine forte et dure. She was given only barley bread and puddle water for three days and then she was stripped and spread on the floor, with her arms outstretched and bound to two posts, a sharp stone ‘as much as a man’s fist’ was placed under her back and a wooden door put over her, onto which was placed seven or eight hundredweight of stones. Within fifteen minutes, the weights had broken her ribs ‘causing them to burst forth of the skin’ and although dead, she was left in the press for six hours. 

Pressing with weights

In 1772, it was enacted that anyone standing mute was to be assumed to be guilty and convicted of the crime charged against him. This happened in 1777, when Francis Mercier was charged with the murder of David Samuel Mondrey. Mercier ‘stood mute’ when charged, so the sheriff ordered a jury to examine whether he did so ‘fraudulently, wilfully, and obstinately or by the visitation of God.’ The jury concluded that Mercier had stood mute fraudulently, wilfully or obstinately, and so Mr Justice Aston immediately passed sentence that Mercier should be executed and his body be dissected and anatomised. 

Daniel Defoe (attrib.) - A History of the Press-Yard - 1717

In 1827, it was further enacted that if a prisoner refused to plead, a court might enter a plea of ‘not guilty’, thus solving a five and a half century old problem.

No comments:

Post a Comment