Due to mix-ups in the drawing up
of family trees, and not helped by individuals in families being given the same
name, historians have confused and conflated two men, both called Laurence
Nowell, from Read Hall in Lancashire. This confusion was not helped when the
Dictionary of National Biography had only one entry for Laurence Nowell, which
included details of the lives of the two Laurences. Alexander Nowell of Read
Hall married Grace Catherall from Mitton, and they had four sons: John,
Laurence, Charles and Thomas. The eldest, John, inherited Read Hall when
Alexander died, and he had a son, Roger, from his first marriage, and when he
remarried after his wife died, he had four more sons and four daughters.
Of
these four sons, the second was called Laurence, and he went on to be a
clergyman and Dean of Lichfield. His uncle Laurence (who was not his cousin, as
some have written), was a historian, who revived interest in the Anglo-Saxon
language and collected original manuscripts written in that language. One of
these, known as the Nowell Codex, contains the only known original manuscript
of the Old English poem, Beowulf (the manuscript, later acquired by Sir Robert
Cotton, is now in the British Museum, where it is catalogued as Cotton
Vitellius A xv – Cotton had classical busts on top of his library shelves, and
this manuscript was the fifteenth book on the first shelf with the bust of the
Roman Emperor Vitellius over it).
First Page of Beowulf - Autotype |
The manuscript was damaged in a fire in the
library on the night of October 23rd 1731, when the edges of the
pages were badly scorched and the book was damaged when it was thrown out of a
window to save it from the flames, and further damage occurred as the untreated
pages crumbled over time. There was a transcript made in 1787, on the order of
Icelandic-Danish historian Grímur Jónsson Thorkelín, who also made another copy
and it is from these we can partially reconstruct the lost sections of the
damaged pages.
This is where my interest started - I bought the 1894 edition of this Harrison and Sharp translation in 1972 for 35p.
In 1879, after becoming Professor of Anglo-Saxon at Cambridge
University, W W Skeat proposed that the manuscript should be autotyped (a type
of photographic process) by the Early English Text Society, and the subsequent
book, edited by Professor Julius Zupitza, was published in 1882. Zupitza used
Thorkelin’s copy for his own transcription of the text. The earliest
translation appeared in 1805, when Sharon Turner published his selection of
verses, with other writers issuing translations of selections over the years;
Thorkelín published a translation into Latin in 1825 – to very poor reviews,
and an English translation into prose by John Kemble in 1837.
Shamus Heaney - Beowulf |
One of the best
is that by Nobel laureate ‘Famous’ Shamus Heaney (1999), which introduces
Northern Irish turns of phrase into the poem, whilst retaining the overall feel of
the poem. If you only ever read one version of Beowulf, this is the one I’d
recommend.
The original Beowulf was written in about 1000 CE, although there is
dispute among academics about the date, as there is about the poem itself. Some
think it may be a transcription of an oral poem, written from several
performances by a scribe, while some think it is an original work written by a
poet or poets – there are two distinct hands in the text. It was written in
England, in Old English, but describes events in Scandinavia, in Denmark and
Geatland (now southern Sweden).
The poem opens with the word Hwæt – which is
variously translated as Listen, Attend or Lo! Some linguists, the eminent David Crystal among them, cite this as an example of the word ‘What’ being used
as a greeting – most famously in the ‘What ho!’ of Bertie Wooster in the Jeeves and Wooster stories by P G Wodehouse.
What Ho! |
No comments:
Post a Comment